Ah yes, fair enough. The reason this javadoc still confused me when I saw
it though was the create-marshal sample. Is something different about
create-marshal such that it would generate a setter in that scenario, or
is the sample stale? (maybe did it used to generate a setter in a prior
release?) Thanks, btw! (talk about a responsive list!)
---
Corbett J. Klempay
Trilogy
512.874.5176 (W) | 512.750.1372 (C)
corbett.klempay_at_trilogy.com
Kohsuke Kawaguchi <Kohsuke.Kawaguchi_at_Sun.COM>
Sent by: Discussion list for the Java Architecture for XML Binding
<JAXB-INTEREST_at_JAVA.SUN.COM>
06/24/2003 03:06 PM
Please respond to JAXB-INTEREST
To: JAXB-INTEREST_at_JAVA.SUN.COM
cc:
Subject: Re: sequence bound with a get but no set?
"Corbett J. Klempay" <Corbett.Klempay_at_trilogy.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone...I'm a newbie (as my question may soon reveal?).
>
> I downloaded 1.0.1 and generated a set of bindings for an XSD. The part
> that is confusing me: in my schema, I have an element called context
> hanging right off the root, minOccurs=1, maxOccurs=unbounded. In the
> generated wrapper for the root element, I have a getContext() method
that
> returns a List (as I'd expect)....but no set method at all. The two
> attributes on this root element both have getters and setters, as I'd
> expect...it's just this pesky contained sequence that is the problem.
If you look at the javadoc generated with the get method, you'll see why
you don't need the set method.
Let us know if the javadoc could be improved.
regards,
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi 408-276-7063 (x17063)
Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com