users@jaxb.java.net

Re: Getting JAXB to instanciate your subclasses

From: Ryan Shoemaker - JavaSoft East <Ryan.Shoemaker_at_sun.com>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 19:49:44 -0400

Ryan Shoemaker - JavaSoft East wrote:
> David Halonen wrote:
>
>>
>> At any rate, I have found a possible solution and would like to have a critical
>> review.
>>
> [...]
>
>>
>> At any rate, what do you think of this bright idea?
>>
>
> Hi David,
>
> We are actually in the process of publishing a FAQ that outlines almost the same
> identical procedure. It should hit the web early next week...
>

I apologize for the lengthy delay in publishing this FAQ entry, but
it is now available on the web:

http://java.sun.com/xml/jaxb/extendingJaxbGeneratedClasses.html

--Ryan

> I don't want to go into too many details in this thread, because it is all covered in
> the forthcoming FAQ, but I will say that you are right on target. Using the implClass
> customization this way is not how the spec intended it to be used, but it does provide
> a way to subclass the generated implementation classes.
>
>> How fragile is this from the perspective that the next release of JAXB will have me
>> crying in my milk?
>>
>
> Two part answer: the ugly double-xjc hack will only be necessary for the current JAXB
> 1.0 FCS release. Using the implClass customization to specify your own subclasses will
> continue to be supported in future versions of Sun's JAXB RI. Future versions of the
> JAXB spec may include other mechanisms for controlling things like replacement classes,
> inheritance, etc.
>
>> What gotcha's do I have to worry about as far as marshalling/unmarshalling fields?
>> ie, if OurConnection has a field named _mySpecialField that is not in the XML will it
>> cause problems?
>>
>
> The one key thing to keep in mind is that this mechanism provides additional behavior,
> not additional data. You can add methods and data to your subclasses, but the content
> model will still only reflect the original content model from the schema. You can add
> _mySpecialField to your subclass, but you won't be able to marshal it out in the xml
> stream.
>
> Thanks for sharing your ideas with the list!
>
> --Ryan
>
>> Regards, David Halonen Compuware 248.737.7300 ext 13578
>>
>