Thanks! As it turns out, I just got it to work exactly as you described one
minute before I received your email. It's still good to have confirmation
that the approach I took is the correct one. Thanks again for responding!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kohsuke Kawaguchi [mailto:Kohsuke.Kawaguchi_at_Sun.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 9:33 AM
> To: JAXB-INTEREST_at_JAVA.SUN.COM
> Subject: Re: jxb:javaType with int
>
>
> There was a change (or clarification) in the specification that led to
> this change in the RI.
>
> > Shouldn't those only be required for non-primitive types?
>
> As a matter of fact, no. I liked the way it was before, but
> anyhow, the
> way it's done today is by design. There's little technical
> detail behind
> it about the mismatch between JDK and XML Schema datatypes, which made
> us think that this is better.
>
> You can simply specify the built-in converters like:
>
> <jaxb:javaType name="int"
> printMethod="javax.xml.bind.DatatypeConverter.printInt"
> parseMethod="javax.xml.bind.DatatypeConverter.parseInt"
>
> regards,
> --
> Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI 408-276-7063 (x17063)
> Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com
>
***********************************************************************************
WARNING: All e-mail sent to and from this address will be received or
otherwise recorded by the A.G. Edwards corporate e-mail system and is
subject to archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to,
someone other than the recipient.
************************************************************************************