>
> No, I definitely wouldn't like such a technology. I think JAXB is great
the
> way it is. I was just clarifiying it, since I got the impression from the
> original post that JAXB was being perceived as a "binding XML" technology,
> rather than a "binding schemas" technology. "Binding" of XML without a
> Schema just leads to sloppy XML, and no type safety.
>
> -Brandon
Sorry Brandon, then mentioning your name I was thinking about Pavel. Of
course your clarification was in 100% right.
I also think that JAXB at this point is good as it is.
Arek