Hi Lisa,
I see ... thanks for the insight.
It seems an unimplemented feature would indeed address your problem, but
a colleague suggests it's typesafeEnumMember. That will be implemented
for FCS (Q1 2003).
Regards,
--
Ed Mooney |Sun Microsystems, Inc.|Time flies like
Java Web Services |UBUR02-201 |an arrow, but
Ed.Mooney_at_Sun.COM |1 Network Drive |fruit flies like
781-442-0459 |Burlington, MA 01803 |a banana. Groucho
Lisa Bahler wrote:
> Ed,
>
> This does seem weird, does it not, to use an empty string as an
> enumeration? We wanted to use nillable in our schemas for our string
> elements, but we found that Turbo XML did not work as we expected,
> although XML Spy worked fine. Wanting to produce schemas that worked
> with the largest number of tools out there, we decided to implement
> nillable by using a union, as so, since we are not concerned with
> defaults:
[ ... ]