Gregory Kick wrote:
> Kohsuke,
>
> I spent a little bit of time tonight and got the codemodel building
> with maven2. (don't look at the timestamps, i took a big break in
> the middle :-) ) you should be able to checkout the codemodel-maven2-
> build branch and run "mvn install site" from the root directory. let
> me know what you think.
>
> as for now, i only added javadocs for reporting because i didn't want
> to deal with some of the scm stuff while it was still in a branch.
> also, i skipped the surefire reporting because the test won't run the
> way that they've been setup. any objection to refactoring into
> testng (my preference) or junit?
>
> anyway, when you have time, try the build and let me know what you
> think.
Excellent! Thank you very much.
I'd probably rename "codemodel-core" and "codemodel-annotation-compiler"
directories to "core" and "annotation-compiler" respectively.
I'd really also like to use the artifactId "codemodel" for the core
module, as that is going to be the primary jar that people will be using.
I think the POM module could use somewhat uglier artifactId, like maybe
"codemodel-pom" or something, since no one is going to directly depend
on this.
How do you think?
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com