Hi Vivek,
+1 on why do I need to run wsgen :-)
Please see this forum post on the problem I had when I did not use wsgen:
<
http://forums.java.net/jive/message.jspa?messageID=220452#220452>
Finally, the only thing that got me unstuck was to do what error message
said and run wsgen
which produced additional classes for the portable artifacts.
Perhaps there is a bug somewhere?
I have a reproducable test case for this. Let me know if you need it.
Thanks.
Vivek Pandey wrote:
> Farrukh,
>
> Why do you need to run wsgen? when you run wsimport against the WSDL
> it will generate all the artifacts for you. Is the confusion arising
> because of 'portable' in the first bullet:
>
> 1. *Use |wsimport| to generate portable artifacts.*
>
>
> -vivek.
>
> Farrukh S. Najmi wrote:
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> I have a WSDL first doc/literal project based on latest JAXWS
>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT.
>>
>> According to latest docs:
>>
>> https://jax-ws.dev.java.net/jax-ws-21-ea1/docs/jaxws-tools.html#mozTocId344067
>>
>>
>> It says:
>>
>> 1.
>>
>>
>> 2.
>>
>>
>>
>> 3. Starting from a WSDL file:
>> 1. *Use |wsimport| to generate portable artifacts.*
>> 2. Implement the service endpoint.
>> 3. Package the WSDL file, schema documents, |web.xml|,
>> |sun-jaxws.xml|, service endpoint interface and
>> implementation class, value types, and generated classes, if
>> any, into a WAR file.
>> 4. Deploy the WAR to a web container.
>>
>>
>> However, I have found that I cannot generate portable artifacts unless I
>> also run wsgen after running wsimport.
>> This is a problem because wsgen requires a Service Endpoint
>> Implementation and I need to generate all JAXWS/JAXB
>> bindings in an implementation independent module "Spec Module" that is
>> then used as a dependency by an implementation-specific module "Impl
>> Module".
>>
>> How does latest JAXWS 2.1 SNAPSHOT support this use case?
>> that actually implements my service.
>>
>> It seems that in order to generate portable artifacts I must have a
>> Service Endpoint Implementation. Is there any way around this?
>>
>> As a separate issue I think docs should be clarified for this confusion.
>>
>> Thanks for your help.
>>
--
Regards,
Farrukh
Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com