I am not full sure but its mostly due to either sjsxp or some other
parsing layer. Not sure if we will see it will be better with Woodstox.
You may like to tryout Woodstox 3.2.1 instead of sjsxp and see if helps you.
-vivek.
Arun Gupta wrote:
> Can we clean up the message and reduce it's size ?
>
> I filed issue #106 for this a while ago.
>
> [1] https://jax-ws.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106
>
> -Arun
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> [Arun Gupta's Blog] New Comment Posted to 'How to invoke a WSIT
> endpoint from a WCF client ?'
> From:
> foo_at_bar.com
> Date:
> Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:56:54 -0700
> To:
> Arun.Gupta_at_sun.com
>
> To:
> Arun.Gupta_at_sun.com
>
>
> A new comment has been posted on your blog Arun Gupta's Blog, on entry #7161 (How to invoke a WSIT endpoint from a WCF client ?).
>
>
> View this comment: <http://weblogs.java.net/blog/arungupta/archive/2007/04/how_to_invoke_a.html>
> Edit this comment: <http://weblogs.java.net/mt/mt.cgi?__mode=view&blog_id=238&_type=comment&id=25317>
>
> IP Address: 64.125.132.43
> Name: siddharthchhabra
> Email Address: foo_at_bar.com
> URL:
> Comments:
>
> hi
> i have a question about the soap messages on the wire -
> 1. why does the payload try and define prefixes it never uses (very annoying) ?
> ns4,ns3 are not used in the last payload but defined nonetheless.
> 2.no ws-addressing prefix in the last payload and default namespace is used for each ws-addressing element ?
>
> both uneccessarily bloat the soap message and make it slightly less readable.
> can we rectify this via some configuration ?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_jax-ws.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_jax-ws.dev.java.net
>