Paul Sandoz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To kickstart alternative transports in JAX-WS Alexey and I decided it
> would be best to do a prototype to better understand and improve the
> client/server transport-based API and the modularity of implementations.
Good idea.
> So Alexey will develop a JMS client and server side prototype transport
> using the rearch branch.
>
> JMS seems appropriate at this time since:
>
> - it provides all the plumbing and we think that the server side
> infrastructure can be used to host the JAX-WS runtime; i.e. we can
> get up to speed relatively quickly.
>
> - there has been demand in the past for a JMS transport, so the
> prototype code may be useful going forward; and
>
> - help understand better asynchronous transports.
Yep.
Is it going to be its own java.net project?
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com