Great to hear, are you in the position to also do an EDR 1 before the next
Renewal Ballot would kick in? (late November)
Werner
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:15 AM, <users-request_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net>
wrote:
> Table of contents:
>
> 1. [jax-rs-spec users] Re: JAX-RS 2.1-m01 has been released - Marek
> Potociar <marek.potociar_at_oracle.com>
> 2. [jax-rs-spec users] Re: hello Again - Marek Potociar <
> marek.potociar_at_oracle.com>
> 3. [jax-rs-spec users] Re: JAX-RS 2.1-m01 has been released - "Markus
> KARG" <markus_at_headcrashing.eu>
> 4. [jax-rs-spec users] Re: JAX-RS 2.1-m01 has been released - Sergey
> Beryozkin <sberyozkin_at_talend.com>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Marek Potociar <marek.potociar_at_oracle.com>
> To: jsr370-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> Cc:
> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:59:16 -0700
> Subject: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: JAX-RS 2.1-m01 has been released
> The release is in a public maven repository and the announcement went to
> the users forum too. I’m not sure how we could make it any more public.
> Thus my confusion with your question.
>
> Marek
>
> On 21 Sep 2016, at 09:29, Markus KARG <markus_at_headcrashing.eu> wrote:
>
> With "may the software get published" I meant whether I may forward that
> software to non-EG-member. Maybe you just published it for the EG members
> and do not want the general public to see it at this state?
> -Markus
>
> *From:* Marek Potociar [mailto:marek.potociar_at_oracle.com
> <marek.potociar_at_oracle.com>]
> *Sent:* Dienstag, 20. September 2016 23:42
> *To:* jsr370-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> *Subject:* Re: [jax-rs-spec users] JAX-RS 2.1-m01 has been released
>
> Hello Markus,
>
> Not sure what policy do you have in mind as well as what do you mean by
> “may this software get published” comment. This software got published -
> that’s what the announcement is about.
>
> There is no list of resolved items unfortunately at this point yet.
>
> Marek
>
>
> On 15 Sep 2016, at 13:46, Markus KARG <markus_at_headcrashing.eu> wrote:
>
> What is the policy? May this software get published or is that just for
> the EG's further discussion?
> Is there a list somewhere what JAX-RS 2.1 items are found in that
> milestone?
> -Markus
>
> *From:* Marek Potociar [mailto:marek.potociar_at_oracle.com
> <marek.potociar_at_oracle.com>]
> *Sent:* Mittwoch, 14. September 2016 17:59
> *To:* jsr370-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net; users_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> *Subject:* ANN: JAX-RS 2.1-m01 has been released
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am happy to announce, that the first non-snapshot development build of
> JAX-RS 2.1 API (2.1-m01) has been released. It is already accessible from
> mave.java.net repository
> <https://maven.java.net/content/repositories/releases/javax/ws/rs/javax.ws.rs-api/2.1-m01/>. Please
> allow a few hours before trying to download the bits from the central maven
> repository.
>
> Thank you,
> Marek
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Marek Potociar <marek.potociar_at_oracle.com>
> To: users_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> Cc:
> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 09:00:27 -0700
> Subject: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: hello Again
> I’m looking into resolving this issue. Not sure why is that the case yet.
>
> Marek
>
> On 26 Sep 2016, at 12:55, Alessio Soldano <asoldano_at_redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Il 26/09/2016 21:26, Marcos Luna ha scritto:
>
> By the way, are we allow to write to jsr370-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> ?? my last reply was rejected, I think we can only post to the user mailing
> list not the expert list
>
> I'm not allowed either to write to the expert group list...
>
> Cheers
> Alessio
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Markus KARG <markus_at_headcrashing.eu>
> To: <jsr370-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net>
> Cc:
> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 20:07:39 +0200
> Subject: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: JAX-RS 2.1-m01 has been released
>
> The question arose from the fact that (at least here in Germany) just
> because a thing effectively is publicly *accessible* does not
> neccessarily mean that it may be publicly *used*.
>
>
>
> -Markus
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Marek Potociar [mailto:marek.potociar_at_oracle.com]
> *Sent:* Donnerstag, 29. September 2016 17:59
> *To:* jsr370-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> *Subject:* Re: [jax-rs-spec users] JAX-RS 2.1-m01 has been released
>
>
>
> The release is in a public maven repository and the announcement went to
> the users forum too. I’m not sure how we could make it any more public.
> Thus my confusion with your question.
>
>
>
> Marek
>
>
>
> On 21 Sep 2016, at 09:29, Markus KARG <markus_at_headcrashing.eu> wrote:
>
>
>
> With "may the software get published" I meant whether I may forward that
> software to non-EG-member. Maybe you just published it for the EG members
> and do not want the general public to see it at this state?
>
> -Markus
>
>
>
> *From:* Marek Potociar [mailto:marek.potociar_at_oracle.com
> <marek.potociar_at_oracle.com>]
> *Sent:* Dienstag, 20. September 2016 23:42
> *To:* jsr370-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> *Subject:* Re: [jax-rs-spec users] JAX-RS 2.1-m01 has been released
>
>
>
> Hello Markus,
>
>
>
> Not sure what policy do you have in mind as well as what do you mean by
> “may this software get published” comment. This software got published -
> that’s what the announcement is about.
>
>
>
> There is no list of resolved items unfortunately at this point yet.
>
>
>
> Marek
>
>
>
> On 15 Sep 2016, at 13:46, Markus KARG <markus_at_headcrashing.eu> wrote:
>
>
>
> What is the policy? May this software get published or is that just for
> the EG's further discussion?
>
> Is there a list somewhere what JAX-RS 2.1 items are found in that
> milestone?
>
> -Markus
>
>
>
> *From:* Marek Potociar [mailto:marek.potociar_at_oracle.com
> <marek.potociar_at_oracle.com>]
> *Sent:* Mittwoch, 14. September 2016 17:59
> *To:* jsr370-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net; users_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> *Subject:* ANN: JAX-RS 2.1-m01 has been released
>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I am happy to announce, that the first non-snapshot development build of
> JAX-RS 2.1 API (2.1-m01) has been released. It is already accessible from
> mave.java.net repository
> <https://maven.java.net/content/repositories/releases/javax/ws/rs/javax.ws.rs-api/2.1-m01/>. Please
> allow a few hours before trying to download the bits from the central maven
> repository.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Marek
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin_at_talend.com>
> To: <jsr370-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net>
> Cc:
> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 09:43:34 +0100
> Subject: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: JAX-RS 2.1-m01 has been released
> So what is the status on accessing JAX-RS 2.0 artifacts from the Central
> Maven Repository, are you also concerned they may not be publicly used ?
>
>
> On 29/09/16 19:07, Markus KARG wrote:
>
> The question arose from the fact that (at least here in Germany) just
> because a thing effectively is publicly *accessible* does not
> neccessarily mean that it may be publicly *used*.
>
>
>
> -Markus
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Marek Potociar [mailto:marek.potociar_at_oracle.com
> <marek.potociar_at_oracle.com>]
> *Sent:* Donnerstag, 29. September 2016 17:59
> *To:* jsr370-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> *Subject:* Re: [jax-rs-spec users] JAX-RS 2.1-m01 has been released
>
>
>
> The release is in a public maven repository and the announcement went to
> the users forum too. I’m not sure how we could make it any more public.
> Thus my confusion with your question.
>
>
>
> Marek
>
>
>
> On 21 Sep 2016, at 09:29, Markus KARG <markus_at_headcrashing.eu> wrote:
>
>
>
> With "may the software get published" I meant whether I may forward that
> software to non-EG-member. Maybe you just published it for the EG members
> and do not want the general public to see it at this state?
>
> -Markus
>
>
>
> *From:* Marek Potociar [mailto:marek.potociar_at_oracle.com
> <marek.potociar_at_oracle.com>]
> *Sent:* Dienstag, 20. September 2016 23:42
> *To:* jsr370-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> *Subject:* Re: [jax-rs-spec users] JAX-RS 2.1-m01 has been released
>
>
>
> Hello Markus,
>
>
>
> Not sure what policy do you have in mind as well as what do you mean by
> “may this software get published” comment. This software got published -
> that’s what the announcement is about.
>
>
>
> There is no list of resolved items unfortunately at this point yet.
>
>
>
> Marek
>
>
>
> On 15 Sep 2016, at 13:46, Markus KARG <markus_at_headcrashing.eu> wrote:
>
>
>
> What is the policy? May this software get published or is that just for
> the EG's further discussion?
>
> Is there a list somewhere what JAX-RS 2.1 items are found in that
> milestone?
>
> -Markus
>
>
>
> *From:* Marek Potociar [mailto:marek.potociar_at_oracle.com
> <marek.potociar_at_oracle.com>]
> *Sent:* Mittwoch, 14. September 2016 17:59
> *To:* jsr370-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net; users_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> *Subject:* ANN: JAX-RS 2.1-m01 has been released
>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I am happy to announce, that the first non-snapshot development build of
> JAX-RS 2.1 API (2.1-m01) has been released. It is already accessible from
> mave.java.net repository
> <https://maven.java.net/content/repositories/releases/javax/ws/rs/javax.ws.rs-api/2.1-m01/>. Please
> allow a few hours before trying to download the bits from the central maven
> repository.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Marek
>
>
>
>
>
> End of digest for list users_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net - Fri, 30 Sep 2016
>
>