On Feb 1, 2013, at 6:14 PM, Markus KARG <markus_at_headcrashing.eu> wrote:
>>> Indeed this looks primising and removes some of the caveats I
>>> mentioned with threads in EJBs. So will the JSR 339 spec get
>>> overhauled by replacing "normal" executors by managed ones?
>>> Particularly the examples showing how to use executors should be
>>> changed so people will understand that they should use managed ones
>> in non-SE environments.
>>
>> We could at least include a reference to this spec. Note that the
>> current spec does not show any code related to the creation of
>> executors, it assumes they were created elsewhere. In any case, I will
>> update that section to mention 236.
>>
>> -- Santiago
>
> Actually page 47 of the public draft showed a code example which utilizes
> Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor. As you remember, I complained that this
> is invalid in an EJB scenario. So the new managed executor could be used
> here instead.
That has been updated a few weeks back (based on your feedback, among others), please check the latest version of the spec.
-- Santiago