users@jax-rs-spec.java.net

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] jaxb link stuff should not be there?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Bill Burke <bburke_at_redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:42:19 -0500

I see you've made Link and Link.Builder abstract/interfaces. SHould you
then remove the Jaxb classes?

-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bill Burke: "[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Why do we need new UriInfo Methods?"
Previous message: Sergey Beryozkin: "[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: FYI - _at_BindingPriority has been replaced with common javax.annotation.Priority"
Next in thread: Santiago Pericas-Geertsen: "[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: jaxb link stuff should not be there?"
Reply: Santiago Pericas-Geertsen: "[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: jaxb link stuff should not be there?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]