On 05/11/12 16:56, Marek Potociar wrote:
>
> On Nov 5, 2012, at 5:47 PM, Sergey Beryozkin<sberyozkin_at_talend.com> wrote:
>
>> On 05/11/12 16:42, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>>> On 05/11/12 16:39, Marek Potociar wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 5, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Sergey Beryozkin<sberyozkin_at_talend.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 05/11/12 12:34, Marek Potociar wrote:
>>>>>> Btw. other than ranting,
>>>>>
>>>>> Will you just stop making conclusions like that ?
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry if the above offended you. I didn't mean it as offensive
>>>> remark - just wanted to say, that you only expressed that you did not
>>>> like it, but you did not support that by any technical argument. At
>>>> least that was my feeling. I don't consider "ranting" as necessarily
>>>> negative. Perhaps it's just a language issue - I'm not a native
>>>> speaker myself.
>>>>
>>>>> I've been thinking before sending the email of what I'm going to say,
>>>>> as opposed to blindly expressing my disagreement. At least I'm not
>>>>> changing my opinion from +0/+1 to -1 to +1.
>>>>
>>>> If you indicate I'm changing my opinion, like that, it's IMO you who's
>>>> being mean on purpose here, even though you are right.
>>>
>>> It was a bad style, I'm sorry.
>>>
>>> Cheers, Sergey
>>>
>>>> While I certainly don't switch sides blindly without thinking (which
>>>> is what you seem to indicate)
>>
>> This is some more noise from me - but I was not referring to you with this last piece. I spent some time with trying to come with some more arguments against the refactoring - I postponed replying to it yesterday as needed more time and I was saying exactly that, I was not just typing blindly away, in response to the "rant" one
>>
>> Anyway, sorry again and I'm off this thread
>
> Now I feel bad. I did not want to discourage you from sharing your thoughts on this thread. I just wanted to say that you did not give me a valid reason why you think we should not to make that change. Please, if you feel like we should discuss this further and investigate more options, feel free to voice your opinions.
>
No problems at all :-). I guess in every process there will be someone
who gets upset if things do not go his/her way, but the process needs to
evolve either way :-), which I what I support. I'll chime in when I see
a git link to the actual update :-)
Cheers, Sergey
> Marek
>
>>
>> Sergey
>>
>>> yet I do not have a problem to
>>>> acknowledge I was wrong when facing sound arguments. There's nothing
>>>> wrong with that IMO.
>>>>
>>>> Marek
>>>>
>>>>> Please hack the hierarchy whichever way you want
>>>>>
>>>>> Sergey
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sergey Beryozkin
>>
>> Talend Community Coders
>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>
>> Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
>