[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: FW: Please discuss

From: Markus KARG <>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 20:04:50 +0100

Please find my answer in JIRA, didn't want to copy and noticed too lated you
answered here in addition.


From: Marek Potociar []
Sent: Freitag, 2. November 2012 19:45
Subject: [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] FW: Please discuss



DynamicFeature is a deploy time concept and will remain to be deploy time
concept. Votes on the Jira issue will not change my opinion. Especially as
there is no way to cast -1 votes.


Filters an make their decision based on HTTP headers already. If we did what
you are suggesting it would have a significant negative impact on
performance because we would have to consult the features and assemble a new
filter chain with every incoming request.





On Nov 2, 2012, at 5:56 PM, Markus KARG <> wrote:



in a private discussion Jan and me thought it could be a good idea that
DynamicFeature (as the word "dynamic" implies it) would include the
possibility to bind filters to http headers, so I'd like to invite you to
discuss this proposal <> and to vote for it if you share
our opinion. :-)