[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: JAX_RS_SPEC-21
Yes, definitively!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
> [mailto:Santiago.PericasGeertsen_at_oracle.com]
> Sent: Montag, 17. September 2012 16:24
> To: jsr339-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> Subject: [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: JAX_RS_SPEC-21
>
>
> On Sep 17, 2012, at 9:22 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>
> > On 06/09/12 19:22, Santiago Pericas-Geertsen wrote:
> >> Hello Experts,
> >>
> >> If you have an opinion on the matter, please chime in on this
> discussion:
> >>
> >> http://java.net/jira/browse/JAX_RS_SPEC-21
> >> <http://java.net/jira/browse/JAX_RS_SPEC-
> 21http://java.net/jira/browse/JAX_RS_SPEC-21>
> >
> > I agree with the original idea, think that the runtime should be
> responsible for making sure Allow is always in the response to OPTIONS
>
> The proposal in that issue was a bit more involved than that. But
> let's assume we just do what you suggest. I.e., allow users to
> implement @OPTIONS and then intercept the response to add Allow if not
> there. I'm assuming we'd do that before running the response filter
> chain.
>
> Is this sufficient for all cases? Is this really more intuitive than
> writing a filter that updates the default response?
>
> -- Santiago