To elaborate more, consider also the extended example:
@Path("foo")
public class FooResource {
@PathParam("id") String id;
@GET
public String getFoo() {
return id;
}
@GET
@Path("bar/{id}")
public String getBar() {
return id;
}
}
Should the above be legal? What should be returned for a GET "/foo" request?
Marek
On 02/23/2012 12:01 PM, Marek Potociar wrote:
> Hello experts,
>
> we've received a bug report in Jersey about the following use case:
>
> @Path("foo")
> public class FooResource {
> @PathParam("id") String id;
>
> @GET
> @Path("bar/{id}")
> public String get() {
> return id;
> }
> }
>
> My question is, given the "id" path template is defined on a sub-resource method, should the value still be injectable
> into the resource field or not?
>
> IOW, with the example above, what should be a result of GET "/foo/bar/baz" request? Should it be "baz" or null ?
>
> Thanks,
> Marek