On 12/13/11 5:59 AM, Marek Potociar wrote:
> Just wanted to add that this functionality is not only focused on some low-percentage use case client extensions. I
> believe it is possible to expect that many users will want to access specifics of Jersey, RestEasy or CXF etc. client
> implementations and configurations in a type-safe way.
>
Sure, but let us (Resteasy, CXF) decide how we want to do this not the spec.
Bill
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com