On 8/29/11 11:21 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> On 29/08/11 16:12, Bill Burke wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/29/11 11:04 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>>> Just few days ago you were all explaining to Bill how important it was
>>> to keep users happy
>>
>> Its funny because I've been trying to do the exact same thing: explain
>> how important it is to keep users happy. A API design that makes sense
>> and is self-documenting creates a lot of user happiness.
>>
> LOL :-)...
> I'd say as a user I want to see
>
> target.path(...).header(blah).get();
>
> get() *is* a request. Thus request().get() is a duplication. The
> transition may look better at the interface level - but no so at the
> user level (at least to me). The problem is request() is only there to
> address the case which most of users like me won't deal with.
>
> apologies if I sound like a broken record :-)
And I've been saying that its just as important to have things
understandable at the interface level.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com