On 8/26/11 2:48 PM, Marek Potociar wrote:
> Are you now suggesting we take the generic invocation out??
Yes. I think many specifications try to incorporate a lot of edge cases
and end up seriously bloating themselves. This may be one of those
scenarios. At the time, it seemed like a good idea that wouldn't affect
the API very harshly. Things have changed.
I'm pretty sure you could combine Invocation, Invocation.Builder, and
SyncInvoker if you did this. I'll edit your latest stuff and show you.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com