On 8/26/11 12:22 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> On 26/08/11 17:19, Marek Potociar wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/26/2011 06:03 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>>> In the previous revision Invocation was a 'dead' redundant entity
>>> only waiting to be dropped. It's back...
>>
>> As author, I disagree. Invocation is the encapsulation of command
>> pattern concept. It would not be dropped.
>
> As I said in the other email, I'm fine with it staying, as long as we
> can come up with a more or less realistic example showing that command
> pattern in action, can you please think of one ? I'll +1 if yes
>
Sergey has a huge point which I alluded to in a previous email. Wasn't
the command pattern something somebody suggested (me I think), rather
than based on user input? Taking it out simplifies things a lot.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com