On 2011-07-06 15:19, Bill Burke wrote:
> ...
>> So we aren't trying to define a client API that is generic enough for
>> extension methods? Anymore?
>
>
> Well, then suggest something.
> ...
I apologize for jumping in late, and not having the whole context.
I'd except an API to make things like GET/POST etc simple, and other
things possible. But those "other" things should still be part of the
base API.
Best regards, Julian