+1 without run()
On 28.06.2011, at 20:28, Bill Burke wrote:
> 1st execute()
> 2nd invoke()
> 3rd run()
>
> On 6/28/11 2:03 PM, Marek Potociar wrote:
>> FYI: Santiago gave me an interesting feedback today: "invocation.invoke()" seem to not read particularly well as the
>> "invoke" information is conveyed twice.
>>
>> I am considering to rename the "invoke" method to "run" or "execute". A question to all: what is your preference?
>>
>> Marek
>>
>> On 06/28/2011 04:40 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>>
>>> invoke()/queue() works nicely with the Command Pattern. A generic subsystem could gather up Invocation requests and
>>> invoke them without worrying about what the method is or which Client it was created from.
>>>
>>> Bill
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com