1st execute()
2nd invoke()
3rd run()
On 6/28/11 2:03 PM, Marek Potociar wrote:
> FYI: Santiago gave me an interesting feedback today: "invocation.invoke()" seem to not read particularly well as the
> "invoke" information is conveyed twice.
>
> I am considering to rename the "invoke" method to "run" or "execute". A question to all: what is your preference?
>
> Marek
>
> On 06/28/2011 04:40 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>
>> invoke()/queue() works nicely with the Command Pattern. A generic subsystem could gather up Invocation requests and
>> invoke them without worrying about what the method is or which Client it was created from.
>>
>> Bill
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com