I think a cache spi/api is a low priority item. Let's nail down the
low-level client API first, then start thinking about these items.
On 5/4/11 12:11 PM, Marek Potociar wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> I just looked more closely at the feature request #39 (http://java.net/jira/browse/JAX_RS_SPEC-39) and it seems to me
> now that the importance of the proposed feature (standard API for client cache configuration and API for enabling or
> disabling local caches) is is currently somewhat overrated.
>
> The feature looks like a nice to have thing to me. Currently proposed API programming model lets you plug in features
> like local cache seamlessly without the framework actually knowing about it. Additionally, I believe that configuration
> is always closely related to an implementation and can be covered by the proposed extensible configuration model.
>
> I would like to downgrade priority of the issue to MINOR. Please let me know if you have any objections.
>
> Thank you,
> Marek
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com