jsr339-experts@jax-rs-spec.java.net

[jsr339-experts] Re: Issue priorities

From: Markus KARG <markus_at_headcrashing.eu>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 19:28:28 +0200

Why not just extending the existing one dealing with default names?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roberto Chinnici [mailto:roberto.chinnici_at_oracle.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 5. April 2011 18:52
> To: jsr339-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> Subject: [jsr339-experts] Re: Issue priorities
>
> Yes, please file an issue. It's better if the issue is specific, e.g.
> instead of "convention over configuration" it's about "defaulting
> annotation values from program element names" or something like that.
>
> I'm OK with it being classified as "major".
>
> On 4/5/11 5:34 AM, Adam Bien wrote:
> > It goes that direction - should I file an issue first?
> >
> > I would like to apply the idea of Convention over Configuration on as
> many levels, as only possible.
> >
> >
> > On 04.04.2011, at 23:09, Roberto Chinnici wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/4/11 1:33 AM, Adam Bien wrote:
> >>> We should start with something "simple". Client API would be the
> most fun to start with.
> >>>
> >>> @Roberto I miss the "Improvement of Convention over Configuration /
> Configuration (Annotation) by Exception". I would prioritize it as
> MAJOR.
> >> Which issue is that? JAX_RS_SPEC-59 [1]?
> >>
> >> [1] http://java.net/jira/browse/JAX_RS_SPEC-59
> >>
> > Consultant, Author, Speaker, Java Champion
> >
> > Weblog: blog.adam-bien.com
> > press: press.adam-bien.com
> > eMail: abien_at_adam-bien.com
> > twitter: twitter.com/adambien
> > Mobile: 0049(0)170 280 3144
> >
> > Author: 7 (Java SE/EE, SOA) Books, about 100 articles
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >