jsr339-experts@jax-rs-spec.java.net

[jsr339-experts] Re: Annotations CoC [Was: Convention Over Configuration]

From: Guilherme Silveira <guilherme.silveira_at_caelum.com.br>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 06:27:06 +0900

If its out of scope I can understand. But I disagree about its difficulties,
or even rocket sciwnce. Extracting simple interfaces should be easier to do
than agreeing whether a rest consumer should be bound to its server
interface.

Regards

On 09/04/2011 4:34 PM, "Markus KARG" <markus_at_headcrashing.eu> wrote:

While obviously CoC is something that is really beneficial to the user's
productivity, I do not think we could find a real justification for adding
another complex API for a pluggable rule set (it would be counter-productive
since it is another thing to learn and support). There are other items
besides CoC of much higher and global interest in our stack, so we should
keep things simple in this area and just think over a few places where CoC
makes really sense instead of doing rocket science.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marek Potociar [mailto:marek.potociar_at_oracle.com]
> Sent: Frei...