I'm fully on your side for removing unnecessary annotations. I just didn't
see the *big* benefit. But I think we should discuss that later, and just
put the item on Roberto's list.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: guilherme.silveira_at_gmail.com
> [mailto:guilherme.silveira_at_gmail.com] On Behalf Of Guilherme Silveira
> Sent: Mittwoch, 9. März 2011 21:02
> To: jsr339-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> Subject: [jsr339-experts] Re: First steps
>
> > But frankly spoken it would remove just one or two annotations
> > from hundreds in our JAX-RS layer.
> It raises the problem :) hundreds of annotations... removing the need
> for them.
> That is what I am looking for. Making it easier to write the same code.
>
> Regards
>
> Guilherme Silveira
> Caelum | Ensino e Inovação
> http://www.caelum.com.br/
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Markus KARG <markus_at_headcrashing.eu>
> wrote:
> > Great idea. But frankly spoken it would remove just one or two
> annotations
> > from hundreds in our JAX-RS layer. So would it be worth the effort?
> >
> >> @Path("something")
> >> @GET
> >> public Response something(...
> >>
> >> @Path("something")
> >> class SomethingResource {
> >> }
> >>
> >> Can we provide default configurations for the above ones?
> >
> >
> >