Wow, if that's true then I've read a lot of misleading literature about WSDL
rpc/literal. I thought what Anne thought - it must be a very common
misunderstanding to associate WSDL binding style="rpc" and SOAP RPC.
-Jon
Marc Hadley wrote:
>The association isn't between rpc and the encoding, its between rpc and
>the data model. I don't think the SOAP 1.1 authors were really thinking
>in terms of WSDL, that came later. Only rpc/encoded is really suitable
>for use with the SOAP rpc convention. rpc/literal is just a WSDL
>convention that cuts down the amount of schema definitions you need.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jax-rpc.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jax-rpc.dev.java.net