I'm not familiar with the details of this interaction, but I would point
out that being "more forgiving" isn't necessarily a good thing. If the
content that you're being "forgiving" with is then being passed to
another container that is not as forgiving, then we have a problem.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Kohlert [mailto:Doug.Kohlert_at_Sun.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 10:52 AM
> To: users_at_jax-rpc.dev.java.net
> Subject: Re: SOAPAction
>
>
> Kevin,
> I am just curious as to why you think an error should be thrown.
> As you mentioned the SI doesn't use the SOAPAction to
> dispatch, therefore
> it is more forgiving. Generally, being more forgiving is a
> good thing.
>
> Thanks
>
> Kevin Jones wrote:
> > I've built a web service from Java and I've specified the
> soapActionBase
> > in the config file. This translates to a <soap:operation
> > soapAction="xxx"/> in the WSDL. I know that the RI doesn't
> route based
> > on the SOAPAction header but it should at least throw an
> exception if
> > the header contains the incorrect value. The current
> release doesn't do
> > this,
> >
> > Kevin Jones
> > http://kevinj.develop.com
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jax-rpc.dev.java.net
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jax-rpc.dev.java.net
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Doug Kohlert
> Java Software Division
> Sun Microsystems, Inc.
> phone: 503 345-9806
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jax-rpc.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jax-rpc.dev.java.net
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jax-rpc.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jax-rpc.dev.java.net