>>>>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:32:35 -0700, Edward Burns <edward.burns_at_oracle.com> said:
EB> So, my original request for help in paring down the 261 commits to
EB> something more manageable still stands. Anyone?
EB> I've made a wiki page in the hopes of getting some help.
EB>
https://java.net/projects/javaserverfaces/pages/2015AdfCompatDrive
EB> Let's see what the results show for 04444992.
>>>>> On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 23:09:44 -0800, Edward Burns <edward.burns_at_oracle.com> said:
EB> Sadly, not good, but my colleague Zhijun has been working with the ADF
EB> team to account for the volatility in test runs even though the Mojarra
EB> commit being used for the tests has not changed from run to run.
EB> I am inclined to reopen the tree, but since Zhijun is working this
EB> issue, I will defer to him.
I did make a small commit for Lenny Primak's JAVASERVERFACES-4077, but I
did not alter the commit that the ADF test job pulls. It is still
04444992.
EB> Thanks for your patience.
>>>>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:23:26 -0500, Vernon Singleton <vernon.singleton_at_liferay.com> said:
VS> Is this still an issue?
EB> Yes, sadly.
VS> Is there anyway I can help?
EB> Can you look up a commit midway between ee9ac42 and 04444992 and we can
EB> try that.
VS> What are the prospects for turning commits to master back on?
EB> The prospects are good, we are working on it, but I am not convinced
EB> that a regression has not been introduced by the ground breaking CDI
EB> work that Arjan has been doing.
EB> Zhijun, I will send you a mail on the internal thread about this.
EB> Ed
EB> --
EB> | edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
--
| edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017