Hi Anthony,
Please let me know what was not working for you getting the build working on
your local machine? If some of the instructions are out of date we
certainly would
like to know.
On the side of the bug fixes, can you file separate issues with respect
to each of
the bugs you have found at the bug tracker at
http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES
And if you have the time to include a test application (with sources
preferably)
that we can use to reproduce the issue that would be great.
Note any proposed bug fix has to go through our testing harness to make sure
the proposed changes don't break anything.
Feel free to ask anything you want related to building the sources, I'll
do my
best to answer them.
Kind regards,
Manfred
On 7/2/2012 2:59 AM, Anthony Mayfield wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am I posting this in the wrong forum? I've spent quite some time setting up
> the sources so that I can commit to this project, could someone please point
> me in the right direction to get some feedback. I understand if it's a busy
> time or I just need to wait longer for a reply but could someone please let
> me know,
>
> All the best,
>
> Anthony.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Mayfield [mailto:info_at_aplossystems.co.uk]
> Sent: 23 June 2012 16:04
> To: dev_at_javaserverfaces.java.net
> Subject: Ids in JSF
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I've finally managed to get the build of the JSF working. I've documented
> two pages of bug fixes and necessary steps required for the build which I'll
> be publishing soon and will put a link up to help others who are hoping to
> build the source.
>
> One of the first updates I've put into the code is so that the id searching
> does not stop at a UIForm as a base if the UIForm is not prepending an id.
> This was making it impossible for some of my components to be found before.
>
> The reason for writing this email is that I've also added a further update
> that if the component is not found relative to the base of the current
> component then the search will continue in the parent base of the current
> base and so on until a match has found. This has made the finding of ids in
> the application much simpler as I no longer need to write an absolute path
> for every component that is not in the relative naming container of the
> current component. I'm just wondering if there's a reason this hasn't been
> done before and if I were to submit this as a patch would it get added to
> the main code?
>
> All the best,
>
> Anthony.
>
>
>