>>>>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:16:02 -0500, Jason Lee <jason_at_steeplesoft.com> said:
JL> I think checking for a parent of UIViewRoot, while helpful, isn't
JL> sufficient. I think you hit on the issue with your UIPanel question. I
JL> think, then, you'd almost have to walk up the tree until you find either
JL> UIViewRoot or a UIForm. The value fro
JL> com.sun.faces.MISSING_FORM_FOR_BUTTON should be updated to reflect that
JL> the immediate parent need not be the UIForm.
JL> There's also no check to make sure the user is in development mode.
JL> This is certain to be expensive, so this shouldn't be done for a
JL> production app (which the issue's initial comment suggests).
I would like it to be the case that if you have any ui components that
implement ActionSource, ActionSource2, or EditableValueHolder that are
not enclosed within a UIForm, then you get the error message.
Furthermore, I would like this feature to take effect only if
ProjectStage == Development. If ProjectStage is not Development, there
must be no runtime performance penalty of any kind, other than checking
the ProjectStage, to support this feature.
Ed
--
| ed.burns_at_sun.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
| 11 work days until JSF 2.1 Milestone 3