Yes. I raised the same issue previously, but I think it went mostly
unnoticed. I see value in this for providing the rendered attribute and
such.
Lincoln Baxter III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
Keep it simple.
On Dec 7, 2009 12:48 PM, "Ed Burns" <Ed.Burns_at_sun.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:23:55 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf <
matzew_at_apache.org> said:
MW> with JSF 2.0, thanks to Facelets, there is a <ui:repeat>. While I
MW> understand that tags/rendering behavior is part of the internals of
MW> an implementation, I am not really sure if the underlying/related
MW> components should be "hidden" by the spec as well.
MW> For instance: I noticed that in MyFaces the UIRepeat extends
MW> UIComponentBase and implements NamingContainer, while with the JSF
MW> RI / Mojarra, the UIRepeat "just" extends the UINamingContainer...
MW> What do you think, regarding the those "unspecified" components ?
>>>>> On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:57:00 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf <
matzew_at_apache.org> said:
MW> ... oh yes... I know that UINamingContainer extends UIComponentBase
MW> and implements NamingContainer....
MW> but instanceof UINamingContainer doesn't say TRUE for the MyFaces
UIRepeat
Hello Matthias, I think I understand what you're asking but I'm not 100%
certain. Are you saying you'd like us to add a
javax.faces.component.UIRepeat class to the API, which has the behavior
and responsibilities of the class currently called
com.sun.faces.facelets.UIRepeat? I'm certainly not opposed to the idea.
Ed
--
| ed.burns_at_sun.com | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To
unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-u...