dev@javaserverfaces.java.net

Re: JSF Component Question

From: Ken Paulsen <Ken.Paulsen_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:58:40 -0800

Hi Jason,

Sounds reasonable.  You may also consider leveraging JSF's "facet" capability so that your tree renderer does not have to be so "smart" when displaying the contents.  In my case, I relied on this to define any TreeNode that was more complicated than plain text or an href.

Another piece of advice (which may be obvious and you may be doing already), when rendering the child tree nodes, don't cast or check for instanceof on any of the child UIComponents... just render all of them.  Some components I've seen written cast to an specific instance (i.e. TreeNode) and call their getters... this prevents things like Ed's AjaxZone from being inserted in the UIComponent tree to re-render portions of the tree dynamically.

Good luck!

Ken Paulsen
ken.paulsen@sun.com
https://jsftemplating.dev.java.net


Jason Lee wrote:
Hmm.  For now, it's using the Swing class, but I think I may create some Java classes that mimic, in terms of nomenclature, the classes supported by the JS component:
 
TreeNode
    TextNode
    HTMLNode
    MenuNode
 
A TreeNode would be able to hold 0 or more TreeNode elements for nested levels.  This hierarchy would help me identify at render time what type of node in the JS i need to create for the given TreeNode on the Java side.
 
Anyone see any problems with that?
 
-----
Jason Lee, SCJP
Programmer/Analyst
http://www.iec-okc.com
 


From: Ken.Paulsen@Sun.COM [mailto:Ken.Paulsen@Sun.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 6:03 PM
To: dev@javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
Subject: Re: JSF Component Question


Hi Jason,

I have had the privilege of writing a JSF tree component and faced the same issue.  There's more than one right approach (or is that more than one wrong approach?).  But I can share what I did.

On the component side, I composed the Tree of multiple UIComponents.  I defined 2 types of components:

    Tree
    TreeNode

From an implementation point-of-view, I ended up having Tree extend TreeNode b/c the root node (represented by Tree) was just a specialized TreeNode.  You could then easily build a tree staticly in a JSP, Facelets xhtml, or JSFTemplating .jsf file.  However, this doesn't (didn't) address the root of your question.

So... on the "data" side, here's what I did.  I defined a factory class for instantiating part of a Tree structure as described above (or the entire structure if you want).  The factory class required a "TreeAdaptor" implementation.  TreeAdaptor" was an interface that exposed methods for walking a tree structure that that factory would call.  The interface also exposed methods for getting meta data needed for the UIComponent (image urls, hyperlink, facets, etc.).  The TreeAdaptor implementations could be written to accept any type of data structure (i.e. swing TreeNode).  This allowed me to walk existing tree structures and "adapt" them to the UIComponent tree structure required to represent them in JSF.

You can see the code here:

https://jsftemplating.dev.java.net/source/browse/jsftemplating/src/java/com/sun/jsftemplating/component/factory/tree/

And for impl. of the TreeAdaptor inteface:

https://glassfish.dev.java.net/source/browse/glassfish/admin-gui/admin-jsf/src/java/com/sun/enterprise/tools/admingui/tree/

I don't know if this type of approach is what you're looking for or not... but I thought I'd share how I dealt with it.

Good luck!

Ken Paulsen
ken.paulsen@sun.com
https://jsftemplating.dev.java.net

Jason Lee wrote:
I'm trying to write a JSF component wrapper for the YUI tree component.  My first thought on how to represent the tree's data to the component, based on discussions I've overheard around the office is TreeNode, with which I have no experience.  I quickly discovered that that interface's package is javax.swing.tree.  My gut reaction is that it seems a little odd to have a JSF component using a Swing interface for its data model, but I see no better, existing interface/class with which to model my tree's data.  Another option is to design a custom class for just this purpose.  Anyone have any thoughts?  For now, I'll probably keep plodding along with TreeNode and see what happens in the interim. :)
 
Thanks!
 
-----
Jason Lee, SCJP
Programmer/Analyst
http://www.iec-okc.com
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@javaserverfaces.dev.java.net For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@javaserverfaces.dev.java.net