dev@javaserverfaces.java.net

RE: Re: [Fwd: RI Sandbox]

From: Jason Lee <lee_at_iecokc.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:51:11 -0500

I'm with Ryan on this. In my mind, *any* JSF component, whether it's a
UI component or not, should work on *any* JSF implementation, and that's
how I've approached wrtiting these components. So far, though, I've
only tested on GF and the RI for a couple of reasons: it's what I have,
and, right now, I can only support JSP (i.e., not Facelets, though I
have nascent support for it) due to a limitation in YUI with regard to
XHTML.

For anyone who'd like to take a look at what I have so far, you can view
the source here:

http://svn.steeplesoft.com/java/yuisf/trunk/

(Any feedback with regard to coding style, the code itself, etc is
certainly welcome. This is my most extensive venture into UI component
writing :). If you'd like to see it running, you can try

http://dev.steeplesoft.com:8080/yuisf

The app server isn't always running, so you may get an error. If you
do, please try again later. That's a dev box at home, so availability
is not always real good. I'm trying to find a better place to host the
demos at the moment.

-----
Jason Lee, SCJP
Programmer/Analyst
http://www.iec-okc.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan.Lubke_at_Sun.COM [mailto:Ryan.Lubke_at_Sun.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 9:07 PM
> To: dev_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: RI Sandbox]
>
> Michael Youngstrom wrote:
> > I think this would be a great idea. Do we think these components
> > should be targeted as ri specific, implementation
> independent, a mix,
> > or a sandbox for each?
> I would say implementation independent would be a good goal.
>
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > On 10/24/06, Ryan Lubke <Ryan.Lubke_at_sun.com> wrote:
> >> I forgot to add that the yui-based components would be donated by
> >> Jason Lee.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: Ryan Lubke <Ryan.Lubke_at_Sun.COM>
> >> To: dev_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> >> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:50:28 -0700
> >> Subject: RI Sandbox
> >> Hey All,
> >>
> >> I'd like to get a discussion going on starting a sandbox
> for the RI.
> >>
> >> Some initial thoughts I have are:
> >> - it would be a directory under the current repository
> >> - the standard checkin process would be ignored
> >> to foster faster development cycles
> >> - we'd provide a separate download bundle for the
> >> components of the sandbox
> >> - this would be open for components, alternate
> >> implementation components, etc.
> >>
> >> There are several candidates for this sandbox already.
> >> - Stan's alternate NavigationHandler which supports
> >> parameters
> >> - 508 compliant datatable since we couldn't
> >> get it in to the MR (there are several folks
> >> interested in this one)
> >> - Some starter yui-based components
> >>
> >> Anyone have any thoughts to add to this?
> >>
> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
>
>