I think this would be a great idea. Do we think these components
should be targeted as ri specific, implementation independent, a mix,
or a sandbox for each?
Mike
On 10/24/06, Ryan Lubke <Ryan.Lubke_at_sun.com> wrote:
> I forgot to add that the yui-based components would be donated by Jason Lee.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Ryan Lubke <Ryan.Lubke_at_Sun.COM>
> To: dev_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:50:28 -0700
> Subject: RI Sandbox
> Hey All,
>
> I'd like to get a discussion going on starting a sandbox for
> the RI.
>
> Some initial thoughts I have are:
> - it would be a directory under the current repository
> - the standard checkin process would be ignored
> to foster faster development cycles
> - we'd provide a separate download bundle for the
> components of the sandbox
> - this would be open for components, alternate
> implementation components, etc.
>
> There are several candidates for this sandbox already.
> - Stan's alternate NavigationHandler which supports
> parameters
> - 508 compliant datatable since we couldn't
> get it in to the MR (there are several folks
> interested in this one)
> - Some starter yui-based components
>
> Anyone have any thoughts to add to this?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
>
>