I'm lost. How does that solve the bookmarking problem?
Stan Silvert
JBoss, a division of RedHat
ssilvert_at_jboss.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacob Hookom [mailto:jacob_at_hookom.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:44 AM
> To: dev_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> Subject: Re: Redirect Params
>
> The only reason I would see for breaking out the params like that is
for
> converter attachment-- but frameworks such as Struts and WebWork
simply
> evaluate the targeted view-id as an Expression, allowing:
>
> /foo.jsf?id=#{action.orderId}
>
> No schema change, just a different NavigationHandler
>
>
>
> Ed Burns wrote:
> >>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:42:16 -0700, Ryan Lubke
<Ryan.Lubke_at_Sun.COM>
> said:
> >>>>>>
> >
> > RL> I don't believe Stan said it wasn't a good place.
> >
> > I'm sorry I implied that was said. I see that it was not.
> >
> > RL> Since jsf-extensions is a drop-in addition to be used with JSF
> > RL> implementations, I think introducing
> > RL> items that break compatibility (such as XSD changes) shouldn't
be
> there.
> >
> > True, but what about Adam's suggestion to put it in an extension
> > element?
> >
> > Ed
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> --------------------------
> Sent from my FrankenBerry Wireless Handheld
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net