RE: It's about time we had a code name and a logo

From: Stan Silvert <>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:41:58 -0500

I posted this yesterday but it didn't go through:

+1 for a name change. I have heard that referring to it as the
Reference Implementation also raises licensing/IP restrictions. Anyone
know about this?

Besides that, RI has a connotation of "not production quality". Maybe
we call it something like, "JSF Production Series"?

Stan Silvert
JBoss, a division of RedHat

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan.Lubke_at_Sun.COM [mailto:Ryan.Lubke_at_Sun.COM]
> Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 3:17 PM
> To:
> Subject: It's about time we had a code name and a logo
> I'm not speaking for anyone else when I say this, but I've become
> somewhat wearing
> of our project being referred to as the "RI".
> So, that having been said, I'm looking to see what others have for
> Please post em here!
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail: