I posted this yesterday but it didn't go through:
+1 for a name change. I have heard that referring to it as the
Reference Implementation also raises licensing/IP restrictions. Anyone
know about this?
Besides that, RI has a connotation of "not production quality". Maybe
we call it something like, "JSF Production Series"?
Stan Silvert
JBoss, a division of RedHat
ssilvert_at_jboss.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan.Lubke_at_Sun.COM [mailto:Ryan.Lubke_at_Sun.COM]
> Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 3:17 PM
> To: dev_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> Subject: It's about time we had a code name and a logo
>
> I'm not speaking for anyone else when I say this, but I've become
> somewhat wearing
> of our project being referred to as the "RI".
>
> So, that having been said, I'm looking to see what others have for
ideas.
>
> Please post em here!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net