>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:42:16 -0700, Ryan Lubke <Ryan.Lubke_at_Sun.COM> said:
RL> I don't believe Stan said it wasn't a good place.
I'm sorry I implied that was said. I see that it was not.
RL> Since jsf-extensions is a drop-in addition to be used with JSF
RL> implementations, I think introducing
RL> items that break compatibility (such as XSD changes) shouldn't be there.
True, but what about Adam's suggestion to put it in an extension
element?
Ed
--
| ed.burns_at_sun.com | {home: 407 869 9587, office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640}
| homepage: | http://purl.oclc.org/NET/edburns/
| aim: edburns0sunw | iim: ed.burns_at_sun.com