> This is exactly what jsf-extensions.dev.java.net is.
>
> Ed
I thought stuff in the extensions project had to be
implementation-neutral?
Stan Silvert
JBoss, a division of RedHat
ssilvert_at_jboss.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Burns [mailto:ed.burns_at_sun.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 4:41 PM
> To: dev_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> Subject: RE: Re: Redirect Params
>
> >>>>> On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:56:15 -0500, Stan Silvert
> <stan.silvert_at_jboss.com> said:
>
> >> >
> >> > Is a true sandbox project a possibility?
> >> >
> >> Yes, I think it is. Do you have a proposal on how this sandbox
should
> >> be structured?
>
> SS> Here is the general idea:
>
> SS> * The JSF Sandbox Project is a platform for experimental new JSF
> SS> features.
>
> SS> * It provides a laboratory for features that go beyond the spec,
but
> SS> cannot be reasonably implemented under current JSF 1.2 extension
> SS> mechanisms.
>
> SS> * The code base comes from the CDDL licensed JSF 1.2
implementation at
> SS> java.net. As much as possible, changes to the original project
are
> SS> migrated to the sandbox.
>
> SS> * All code in the sandbox will use the CDDL license.
>
> This is exactly what jsf-extensions.dev.java.net is.
>
> Ed
>
> --
> | ed.burns_at_sun.com | {home: 407 869 9587, office: 408 884 9519 OR
x31640}
> | homepage: | http://purl.oclc.org/NET/edburns/
> | aim: edburns0sunw | iim: ed.burns_at_sun.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net