users@javaserverfaces-spec-public.java.net
[jsr372-experts mirror] Draft for JSF 2.3 doesn't address JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1366 Within Resource Identifier, allow resourceName to have path separator
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Arend v. Reinersdorff <
arend_at_arendvr.com
>
Date
: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 22:58:29 +0100
Hi,
could this issue be addressed in JSF 2.3? It has not been fixed in the
public review draft. Path separators in resourceNames are widely used:
https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1366
Best regards,
Arend
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
arjan tijms: "[jsr372-experts mirror] Re: Draft for JSF 2.3 doesn't address JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1366 Within Resource Identifier, allow resourceName to have path separator"
Previous message
:
Leonardo Uribe: "[jsr372-experts mirror] [jsr372-experts] Re: Report Issues of JSF 2.3 Public Review"
Next in thread
:
arjan tijms: "[jsr372-experts mirror] Re: Draft for JSF 2.3 doesn't address JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1366 Within Resource Identifier, allow resourceName to have path separator"
Reply
:
arjan tijms: "[jsr372-experts mirror] Re: Draft for JSF 2.3 doesn't address JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1366 Within Resource Identifier, allow resourceName to have path separator"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]