users@javaserverfaces-spec-public.java.net
[jsr372-experts mirror] [jsr372-experts] JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-790, what is the correct solution for portlets?
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Bauke Scholtz <
balusc_at_gmail.com
>
Date
: Mon, 30 May 2016 15:38:09 +0200
https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-790?focusedCommentId=392435#comment-392435
I'm currently looking at this and posted a comment with several solutions.
I only don't have a portlet environment at hands to test. Can a portlet guy
please confirm which of the proposals won't break forms in JSF portlets?
Thanks!
Cheers, B
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Cagatay Civici: "[jsr372-experts mirror] [jsr372-experts] Re: Submission for JavaOne"
Previous message
:
Neil Griffin: "[jsr372-experts mirror] [jsr372-experts] Re: Re: Re: Deprecating types in javax.faces.bean package?"
Next in thread
:
Neil Griffin: "[jsr372-experts mirror] [jsr372-experts] Re: JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-790, what is the correct solution for portlets?"
Reply
:
Neil Griffin: "[jsr372-experts mirror] [jsr372-experts] Re: JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-790, what is the correct solution for portlets?"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]