I'm okay with either Slack or IRC.
Do we want the channel to be directly public, or do we post the chat log
afterwards?
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Josh Juneau <juneau001_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to a Slack channel and meetings more often.
>
> Josh Juneau
> juneau001_at_gmail.com
> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Kito Mann <kito.mann_at_virtua.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Sorry I'm so late to the party, but I think it's safe to say the EG has
>> overall been pretty quiet. Honestly, I think it's because no one has a lot
>> of time available, including the spec leads. That being said, we've got to
>> continue to move forward, and I'm glad that Arjan and Bauke have been
>> pushing so hard.
>>
>> Has anyone thought about creating a Slack channel instead of IRC? I'm
>> fine with IRC, but Slack is hipper these days so we might get some more
>> interest. Either, way, some sort of bi-weekly meeting is an excellent idea.
>> My guess is sometime early in the morning (PT) would work.
>>
>> Ed and Manfred, it would help if you could remind us what everyone's
>> assignments are; I don't think everything is in JIRA (please correct me if
>> I'm wrong). I know I have an issue related to synchronizing tokens on my
>> plate.
>>
>> ___
>>
>> Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
>> Web Components, Polymer, JSF, PrimeFaces, Java EE, and Liferay training
>> and consulting
>> Virtua, Inc. | virtua.tech
>> JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral
>> +1 203-998-0403
>>
>> * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: *http://
>> <http://blogs.jsfcentral.com/JSFNewscast/>enterprisejavanews.com
>> <http://ww.enterprisejavanews.com>*
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 9:53 AM, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> He everyone,
>>>
>>> I'd like to share some concerns about the level of activity of this EG.
>>>
>>> I'm very happy with the recent proposal by Bauke, but apart from that,
>>> activity currently doesn't seem to be at the same level as it once was.
>>>
>>> If you look at the commits in the RI, then it's quite clear that
>>> activity is a little down, even after the master branch was opened again.
>>> See https://github.com/javaserverfaces/mojarra/commits/master
>>>
>>> Looking at the amount of actual features being developed for JSF 2.3
>>> (e.g. actual code), then when JSF 2.3 just started Manfred was doing an
>>> amount of commits for the initial CDI alignment feature, but after
>>> approximately early 2015 I didn't see JSF 2.3 feature commits from him
>>> anymore (please correct me if I'm wrong, I may have missed something).
>>>
>>> As for Ed, there were some clarifications during 2015 and one bigger
>>> feature just before JavaOne (validateWholeBean). I'm not entirely sure if
>>> that feature is deemed fully ready wrt to the implementation (the spec
>>> issue is closed though), but after JavaOne no more commits were being done
>>> for it.
>>>
>>> As for the various EG members, a variety of issues were assigned to
>>> different people, but I've not yet seen many patches or code commits for
>>> those. The only one that comes to mind is the Java 8 JSR 310 from Josh and
>>> Ed (again, correct me if I missed something).
>>>
>>> Now my own activity is down too, so I know I'm to blame as well, but
>>> that still doesn't take away that IMHO activity could improve a little.
>>> It's now almost 2016, so perhaps a good time to reflect on what we have
>>> accomplished last year and what we plan to accomplish next year ;)
>>>
>>> Something that may help here is a scheduled bi-weekly IRC chat, just to
>>> see where we stand and were we're heading.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Arjan Tijms
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>