>>>>> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:49:50 +0100, Ian Hlavats <ian_at_tarantulaconsulting.com> said:
IH> Hey guys,
IH> I'm late on the reply but I want to say, I think it's crucially important that wherever we decide to define the resource contracts, this definition should support EL.
IH> For example:
IH> <f:view contracts="#{cms.resourceContracts}">
IH> ...
IH> </f:view>
IH> If we move the resource contract configuration to faces-config.xml
IH> wouldn't we lose the ability to use EL expressions?
The latest thinking in that PDF I just shared does allow it to be in
<f:view> and with EL.
Ed
--
| edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/