I believe the functional test is ready to go. I just need to commit the
pull request. I'm hoping to do that within the next day.
Thanks!
Josh Juneau
juneau001_at_gmail.com
http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 9:40 AM, manfred riem <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>
wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> How is JAVASERVERFACES-4093 going?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Kind regards,
> Manfred Riem
>
> On 1/3/17, 3:06 PM, Josh Juneau wrote:
>
> Hi Manfred,
>
> Yes, I only have completion of JAVASERVERFACES-4093 in my queue at this
> time. I am hoping to commit some tests to complete the work soon.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Josh Juneau
> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>
>
> On Jan 3, 2017, at 2:38 PM, manfred riem <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Josh,
>
> To be 100% clear, so you only have completion of JAVASERVERFACES-4093 in
> your queue?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Kind regards,
> Manfred Riem
>
> On 12/29/16, 8:59 AM, Josh Juneau wrote:
>
> Hi Manfred/All,
>
> I have worked through JAVASERVERFACES-4093
> <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4093> once again and I am
> working on creating a functional test and making it part of the test
> suite. It is taking me a bit of time since I'm just learning the test
> harness/structure. The issue is actually not a JSF problem at all...things
> do function as expected in my opinion.
>
> Bauke picked up JAVASERVERFACES-4110
> <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4110> and completed
> it...thanks for the assistance!
>
> I read through the f:convertDateTime documentation within the
> specification PDF and all looks good!
>
> Let me know if there's anything else I can do with respect to these
> items. Otherwise I will commit a pull request with the test for 4093 once
> it is completed.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Josh Juneau
> juneau001_at_gmail.com
> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Josh Juneau <juneau001_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Manfred/All,
>>
>> I've not had a chance to work on the items that I'd like to finish up
>> just yet. I should have some time over the next week with the holiday.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> Josh Juneau
>> juneau001_at_gmail.com
>> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
>> https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:10 AM, manfred riem <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Josh,
>>>
>>> How is it going?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Manfred Riem
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/12/16, 10:38 PM, Josh Juneau wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Manfred,
>>>
>>> Glad to see things moving forward. I think some of the recently
>>> discussed issues/enhancements would be nice to see as part of JSF 2.3.
>>> However, I can certainly understand the need to start ramping down on the
>>> JSR.
>>>
>>> 1) have done:
>>>
>>> - Helped out with JAVASERVERFACES-1370 (Provide Converters for Date-Time
>>> API)
>>>
>>> - JAVASERVERFACES-4066
>>> <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4066> Troubleshooted and
>>> determined it was not an issue
>>>
>>> - JAVASERVERFACES-4110: Provided bug fix and committed.
>>>
>>> 2) Currently Doing:
>>>
>>> - JAVASERVERFACES-4093
>>> <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4093>: I should be able
>>> to finish this...need to supply a functional test.
>>>
>>> - JAVASERVERFACES-4110
>>> <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4110>: I'll certainly
>>> try to get this one worked out soon
>>>
>>> 3) Not going to do:
>>>
>>> I don't have anything else assigned to me at this time. I was planning
>>> to help sift through the open issues but I am not sure if I'll have time to
>>> do so.
>>>
>>> Hope this helps. I do not think there would need to be any text in the
>>> specification, other than the date-time API enhancements. Thanks
>>>
>>> Josh Juneau
>>> juneau001_at_gmail.com
>>> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
>>> https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 9:47 AM, manfred riem <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Josh,
>>>>
>>>> Can you please tell me what issues you
>>>>
>>>> 1) have done
>>>> 2) are currently doing (and which can be completed and which is not)
>>>> 3) are not going to do
>>>>
>>>> And for 1) and 2) if there is going to be a need for any text in the
>>>> Specification (the PDF document).
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Manfred Riem
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>