Hi Josh,
How is JAVASERVERFACES-4093 going?
Thanks!
Kind regards,
Manfred Riem
On 1/3/17, 3:06 PM, Josh Juneau wrote:
> Hi Manfred,
>
> Yes, I only have completion of JAVASERVERFACES-4093 in my queue at 
> this time.  I am hoping to commit some tests to complete the work soon.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Josh Juneau
> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com <http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com/>
> https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>
>
> On Jan 3, 2017, at 2:38 PM, manfred riem <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com 
> <mailto:manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Josh,
>>
>> To be 100% clear, so you only have completion of JAVASERVERFACES-4093 
>> in your queue?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Manfred Riem
>>
>> On 12/29/16, 8:59 AM, Josh Juneau wrote:
>>> Hi Manfred/All,
>>>
>>> I have worked through JAVASERVERFACES-4093 
>>> <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4093> once again and I 
>>> am working on creating a functional test and making it part of the 
>>> test suite.  It is taking me a bit of time since I'm just learning 
>>> the test harness/structure.  The issue is actually not a JSF problem 
>>> at all...things do function as expected in my opinion.
>>>
>>> Bauke picked up JAVASERVERFACES-4110 
>>> <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4110> and completed 
>>> it...thanks for the assistance!
>>>
>>> I read through the f:convertDateTime documentation within the 
>>> specification PDF and all looks good!
>>>
>>> Let me know if there's anything else I can do with respect to these 
>>> items.  Otherwise I will commit a pull request with the test for 
>>> 4093 once it is completed.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Juneau
>>> juneau001_at_gmail.com <mailto:juneau001_at_gmail.com>
>>> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
>>> https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Josh Juneau <juneau001_at_gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:juneau001_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hi Manfred/All,
>>>
>>>     I've not had a chance to work on the items that I'd like to
>>>     finish up just yet.  I should have some time over the next week
>>>     with the holiday.
>>>
>>>     Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>     Josh Juneau
>>>     juneau001_at_gmail.com <mailto:juneau001_at_gmail.com>
>>>     http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
>>>     https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>>>     <https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866>
>>>
>>>
>>>     On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:10 AM, manfred riem
>>>     <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com <mailto:manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Hi Josh,
>>>
>>>         How is it going?
>>>
>>>         Thanks!
>>>
>>>         Kind regards,
>>>         Manfred Riem
>>>
>>>
>>>         On 12/12/16, 10:38 PM, Josh Juneau wrote:
>>>>         Hi Manfred,
>>>>
>>>>         Glad to see things moving forward.  I think some of the
>>>>         recently discussed issues/enhancements would be nice to see
>>>>         as part of JSF 2.3.  However, I can certainly understand
>>>>         the need to start ramping down on the JSR.
>>>>
>>>>         1) have done:
>>>>
>>>>         - Helped out with JAVASERVERFACES-1370 (Provide Converters
>>>>         for Date-Time API)
>>>>
>>>>         - JAVASERVERFACES-4066
>>>>         <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4066> Troubleshooted
>>>>         and determined it was not an issue
>>>>
>>>>         - JAVASERVERFACES-4110:  Provided bug fix and committed.
>>>>
>>>>         2)  Currently Doing:
>>>>
>>>>         - JAVASERVERFACES-4093
>>>>         <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4093>:  I
>>>>         should be able to finish this...need to supply a functional
>>>>         test.
>>>>
>>>>         - JAVASERVERFACES-4110
>>>>         <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4110>:  I'll
>>>>         certainly try to get this one worked out soon
>>>>
>>>>         3)  Not going to do:
>>>>
>>>>         I don't have anything else assigned to me at this time.  I
>>>>         was planning to help sift through the open issues but I am
>>>>         not sure if I'll have time to do so.
>>>>
>>>>         Hope this helps.  I do not think there would need to be any
>>>>         text in the specification, other than the date-time API
>>>>         enhancements.  Thanks
>>>>
>>>>         Josh Juneau
>>>>         juneau001_at_gmail.com <mailto:juneau001_at_gmail.com>
>>>>         http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
>>>>         https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>>>>         <https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 9:47 AM, manfred riem
>>>>         <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com <mailto:manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>>
>>>>         wrote:
>>>>
>>>>             Hi Josh,
>>>>
>>>>             Can you please tell me what issues you
>>>>
>>>>             1) have done
>>>>             2) are currently doing (and which can be completed and
>>>>             which is not)
>>>>             3) are not going to do
>>>>
>>>>             And for 1) and 2) if there is going to be a need for
>>>>             any text in the
>>>>             Specification (the PDF document).
>>>>
>>>>             Kind regards,
>>>>             Manfred Riem
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>