FYI: I will take this issue on me.
Cheers, B
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Kito Mann <kito.mann_at_virtua.com> wrote:
> I like the passthrough approach, but we should really provide a tag too.
> There are still plenty of people who don't use the pure HTML syntax
> (especially since it's not supported by third-party component libraries).
>
> ___
>
> Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
> Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and consulting
> http://www.JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral
> +1 203-998-0403
>
> * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: *http://
> <http://blogs.jsfcentral.com/JSFNewscast/>enterprisejavanews.com
> <http://ww.enterprisejavanews.com>*
> * JSFCentral Interviews Podcast: http://www.jsfcentral.com/
> resources/jsfcentralpodcasts/
> * Sign up for the JSFCentral Newsletter: http://oi.vresp.
> com/?fid=ac048d0e17
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Edward Burns <edward.burns_at_oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
>> >>>>> On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 13:55:21 +0300, Cagatay Civici <
>> cagatay.civici_at_gmail.com> said:
>>
>> CC> I like this approach as well, better than what we have discussed so
>> far.
>> CC> +1,
>>
>> CC> So Bauke, do you propose we dont do anything since it can be already
>> CC> solved with current APIs?
>>
>> I've asked the original poster, Ryan de Laplante, if he's satisfied with
>> this approach.
>>
>> Either way, it's a pretty compelling endorsement of pass through
>> elements and attributes.
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> --
>> | edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
>> | 28 Business days til JavaOne 2015
>> | 43 Business days til DOAG 2015
>>
>
>