jsr372-experts@javaserverfaces-spec-public.java.net

[jsr372-experts] Re: [jsr372-experts mirror] Re: Deprecating types in javax.faces.bean package?

From: arjan tijms <arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 22:44:31 +0200

Hi,

Thanks for the support Michael en Paul :) I've created
https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1417 in support of
this.

Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms


On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Paul Nicolucci <pnicoluc_at_us.ibm.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul Nicolucci
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Michael Müller ---05/18/2016 03:40:02
> PM---+99999 (at least) This avoids a commonly Seen problem]Michael Müller
> ---05/18/2016 03:40:02 PM---+99999 (at least) This avoids a commonly Seen
> problem
>
> From: Michael Müller <michael.mueller_at_mueller-bruehl.de>
> To: jsr372-experts_at_javaserverfaces-spec-public.java.net
> Date: 05/18/2016 03:40 PM
> Subject: [jsr372-experts] Re: [jsr372-experts mirror] Deprecating types
> in javax.faces.bean package?
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> +99999 (at least)
>
> This avoids a commonly Seen problem
> --
> Herzliche Grüße, best regards
> Michael Müller
>
> Am 18. Mai 2016 20:43:11 MESZ, schrieb arjan tijms <arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com
> >:
>
> Hi,
>
> As it's been clear for some time we're moving away from the JSF native
> managed bean facility, I'd like to propose deprecating all the types in the
> javax.faces.bean package via the @deprecated annotation and/or javadoc, and
> mention what the alternative is now.
>
> This would particularly be helpful with things like
> javax.faces.bean.RequestScoped vs javax.enterprise.context.RequestScoped,
> where people not rarely import the wrong version.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Kind regards,
> Arjan Tijms
>
>
>




graycol.gif
(image/gif attachment: graycol.gif)