jsr372-experts@javaserverfaces-spec-public.java.net

[jsr372-experts] Re: [jsr372-experts mirror] Re: Re: [JAVASERVERFACES-SPEC_PUBLIC-1396] f:socket for SSE and WebSocket PROPOSAL

From: Michael Müller <michael.mueller_at_mueller-bruehl.de>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 18:49:40 +0100

Great work! Thanks.

Herzliche Grüße - Best Regards,

Michael Müller
Brühl, Germany
blog.mueller-bruehl.de <http://blog.mueller-bruehl.de/>
it-rezension.de <http://it-rezension.de/>
@muellermi


Read my books
"Web Development with Java and JSF": https://leanpub.com/jsf
"Java Lambdas und (parallel) Streams" Deutsche Ausgabe:
https://leanpub.com/lambdas-de
"Java Lambdas and (parallel) Streams" English edition:
https://leanpub.com/lambdas

Am 04.03.2016 um 16:08 schrieb Bauke Scholtz:
> Hi,
>
> I have furher improved f:websocket:
> - support for view scope as in scope="view", this makes it possible to send
> the message only to the current view.
> - explicitly close session and view scoped websockets when associated
> session or view is expired in server side, to avoid stale websockets (this
> opens a nice possibility: JavaScript code in <f:websocket onclose> can be
> used to directly notify user about expired session or view).
> - support for user target as in user="#{request.remoteUser}" or
> user="#{someLoggedInUser.id}", this makes it possible to have an
> user-targeted push via channelName.send(someMessageObject, recipientUserId).
> - support for observable CDI events: @Opened WebsocketEvent and @Closed
> WebsocketEvent.
>
> I feel it's ready. Now only the test cases (and specification document?).
> Detailed usage instructions can be found in javax.faces.push.Push javadoc.
>
> Cheers, B
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Josh Juneau <juneau001_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Excellent work! I will put this in my queue to blog about soon.
>>
>> Josh Juneau
>> juneau001_at_gmail.com
>> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
>> https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Kito Mann <kito.mann_at_virtua.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Nice!
>>>
>>> ___
>>>
>>> Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
>>> Web Components, Polymer, JSF, PrimeFaces, Java EE, and Liferay training
>>> and consulting
>>> Virtua, Inc. | virtua.tech
>>> JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral
>>> +1 203-998-0403
>>>
>>> * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: *http://
>>> <http://blogs.jsfcentral.com/JSFNewscast/>enterprisejavanews.com
>>> <http://ww.enterprisejavanews.com>*
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 4:34 AM, Bauke Scholtz <balusc_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> As I wasn't fully satisfied with push scoping, I have further improved
>>>> f:websocket to support new attribute scope="session" (next to the default
>>>> of scope="application"). This will make it possible to send the message
>>>> only to the views in the current HTTP session, without the need to manually
>>>> mess with channel name. To remember the current HTTP session during
>>>> actually sending the push message (at that moment, there's not necessarily
>>>> a HTTP request available), I had to rework PushContext and add a new
>>>> annotation, @Push. The usage is now like:
>>>>
>>>> @Inject @Push
>>>> private PushContext channelName;
>>>>
>>>> public void someAction() {
>>>> channelName.send(someMessageObject);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Test cases will follow.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, B
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:02 PM, manfred riem <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Bauke,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/14/16, 9:34 AM, Bauke Scholtz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I finished f:websocket, see patch in
>>>>>> https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1396
>>>>>>
>>>>> Cool!
>>>>>
>>>>> No unit tests have been added, this will come later. Existing unit
>>>>>> tests run without trouble.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will commit next week in case no one objects.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Please make sure when you commit the unit tests are included.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> Manfred Riem
>>>>>
>>>>>