Hi Kito,
It took it as the JavaScript functions getClientId() or
getClientId('whatever') as it is said to be JS function.
Regards,
Manfred
On 1/12/15, 11:33 AM, Kito Mann wrote:
> Is the JIRA issue just asking about EL evaluation (as the example
> implies), or is it referring to a real JavaScript function?
>
> In other words, are they asking about this:
>
> <h:button id="button1"
> onclick="button_setEnabled(*#{getClientId('button2')}*,
> false);button_clicked(*#{getClientId('button1')}*;return"... />
>
> or:
>
> <h:button id="button1"
> onclick="button_setEnabled(*getClientId('button2')*,
> false);button_clicked(*getClientId('button1')*;return"... />
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:27 PM, manfred riem
> <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com <mailto:manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Kito,
>
> Ughh, as you pointed out the client id is already there. My brain
> just stopped working :(.
>
> However I still want to mark this issue as "Won't fix" as there is
> no way of knowing how a specific component is being rendered and
> which HTML element corresponds to the client id of the component.
> And no I don't want to make any assumption on how it is structured.
>
> Thoughts?
> Manfred
>
>
> On 1/12/15, 11:13 AM, Kito Mann wrote:
>> Manfred, can you articulate your objection more clearly? We
>> definitely know the client id before the JavaScript executes,
>> since it executes on the client :-).
>>
>> ___
>>
>> Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
>> Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and
>> consulting
>> http://www.JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral
>> +1 203-998-0403 <tel:%2B1%20203-998-0403>
>>
>> * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: _http://
>> <http://blogs.jsfcentral.com/JSFNewscast/>enterprisejavanews.com
>> <http://ww.enterprisejavanews.com>_
>> * JSFCentral Interviews Podcast:
>> http://www.jsfcentral.com/resources/jsfcentralpodcasts/
>> * Sign up for the JSFCentral Newsletter:
>> http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:00 PM, manfred riem
>> <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com <mailto:manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I like to close
>> https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-49
>> as "Won't fix" as this request suffers from the chicken and
>> the egg problem. In this particular case we cannot make sure
>> the client id is rendered before the JavaScript executes.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> Manfred
>>
>>
>